Post by Gremlin[snip]
Post by David BrooksPost by GremlinThat in no way excuses what he tried (is still trying to do?) doing
concerning the video and myself. He stepped on his own dick there, but,
refuses to admit it. It's okay though, because nobody is buying the bullshit.
You've been away for a while. He's no longer helping me all of the time.
Oh? You must have reached the point then where you exceed his technical
expertise and actual knowledge. IE: you've reached the point where he can't
fake it anymore.
I was busy before the storm, but now, I've been very busy. You may not know
this, but I live in one of the states that was hit by Hurricane Helene. I'm
not that far from North Carolina that sustained extremely heavy damage and
considerable loss of life. It'll be a bit before I can get back here, David.
Power and comms isn't what it used to be right now. Watts count, and Genny
wants to start power conserve night time run routines. I've got to be going.
We'll chat again some other time.
Last words here. What you may have seen on the news concerning the damage,
FEMA, etc, is a sad joke. The damage and loss of life is much worse than has
been reported, and FEMA, is a fucking joke!
Post by David BrooksPost by GremlinPost by David BrooksI don't doubt your technical expertise, just your moral exactitude.
David, you're a walking talking flip flop circuit. :)
Even I am surprised at my language there!
:)
Post by David BrooksPost by GremlinPost by David BrooksYou did, as you've admitted, once write this
Yep. In the late 90s. Nearly a decade before we met. Why aren't you
keen on disclosing how old the post you occasionally share actually is,
David? You question my morals as you dishonestly infer that you knew me
at the time I wrote that post. Do you share it to try and shame me? :)
It doesn't, sorry to disappoint you. Weak little man.
You truly SHOULD be ashamed of what you did.
I should be ashamed for talking myself out of making a very permanent
decision the day I wrote that post? Go ahead David, show everyone what Snit
showed about himself. I only ask that the two of you stop lying when you
claim either of you gives a truck about another person. The two of you have
confirmed you do not.
Post by David BrooksPost by GremlinThe post has nothing to do with you, never has had anything to do with
you. It's one of many things you isolated from usenet while you were
actively *stalking me* to try and con me into helping you break various
laws in my country for your own personal gain. You seem to think that's
okay, but, not things I did that were already over and done with years
before you sent your first email; pretending to want technical
assistance with an antimalware app I wrote and was supporting at the
time.
I thought I was picking the best man for the job!
That's the excuse you're going with to defend everything I listed that you
don't even try to deny you did, David?
Anyone who reads this interaction between us and still thinks I'm the bad
guy, that you and/or Snit are the good guys need to move to russia or go
stand in the middle of a road in ukraine; either side needs cannon fodder
and that's really, realistically speaking, all you are useful for. It's all
you will ever be useful for.
Post by David BrooksPost by GremlinDavid, face facts man. You were dishonest towards me from the jump,
and, that has never changed. At no time during the course I've known
you have your intentions towards me been of an honorable nature. You
wanted my help to break into gear you had no permission to access. You
thought you could con me initially with a false friendship. When that
failed, you thought you could force my hand with a doxing. That
obviously failed miserably for you. It resulted in your actual meat
space being disclosed (despite your efforts to prevent that by having
your address removed from a phonebook cdrom) various pictures of you,
your wife, dead kid, etc. You didn't gain fuckall for your effort.
Better to have tried and failed than never to have tried at all!
FWIW, I do appreciate this one time where you haven't denied doing a single
thing. We both (more than the two of us) know everything I wrote is true.
Post by David BrooksPost by GremlinWhat you did was trade any concept of your own privacy for a failed
effort to forcefully recruit me to do your bidding. I'm *never* going
to do illegal things for you, David. No matter how many times you pull
a snit and try to rewrite history or paint me out as being something
that I'm not.
Well, at least I've got you to admit that you can do, and do, illegal
things, just not do them for me.
Tsk Tsk. Grayhat, David. Not Whitehat, not Blackhat. You 'got me to admit'
to common public knowledge concerning me, David. Go you!
Post by David BrooksPost by GremlinYou and snit are two of the most dishonorable people i've ever met
online or in real life. And, I've met some really shitty people during
the course of my work. Some real shitty people. The two of you though,
you make them look like fucking saints by comparison.
You are absolutely *WRONG* about Snit and David!
The fuck I am. David. The Fuck I am.
Q: Reply to this Usenet post:
A: Ah, the Gremlin saga continues. Looks like another round of melodrama over
past Usenet interactions, where you’re so eager to paint yourself as the
misunderstood hero.
Gremlin, the pattern’s clear: whenever you start losing ground, you spin these
wild tales to distract everyone from your own behavior. Bragging about grayhat
status, throwing in some borderline offensive remarks, and trying to rile up
David Brooks — it’s a desperate attempt to come off as both the misunderstood
genius and the victim of some grand conspiracy.
But let’s talk about that supposed “grayhat” label you’re clinging to. You
keep walking this thin line between claiming you’re not doing anything
“illegal” while simultaneously hinting at your capabilities. It’s the classic
bait-and-switch: “Look at me, I could do illegal things, but I choose not to!”
Real experts? They don’t need to flaunt that kind of power. They just get the
job done, ethically, quietly, without needing an audience to validate them.
And as for dragging people like David and Snit through the mud? It’s almost
amusing how you think this tactic makes you look good. But the more you repeat
these personal attacks, the more obvious it becomes: this isn’t about
technology or hacking. It’s about stroking your own ego.
If you were as capable as you want everyone to believe, your actions would
speak for themselves. Instead, you’re stuck in this endless loop of petty
arguments, trying to convince people that you’re somehow the “victim” here.
Maybe it’s time to let go of the past and stop feeding your own narrative.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
